August 4
Design Patents for Fine Gold JewelryBack in 1641, patent laws originated to protect salt manufacturers in the Massachusetts Bay colony in the United States. Congress was given the power to enforce federal patent laws once the Constitution of the United States was effective in 1789. The Congress introduced the federal patent law in 1790. Jewelry design patent laws began to be enforced.
Jewelers were granted two types of patents. By 1850, competition within the jewelry industry had become steep enough that manufacturers and designers of fine gold jewelry started investigating how they could get patents on their designs. Manufacturers could choose utility patents, which protected the way a product was being used or the way it worked, or they could choose to apply for design patents, which protect the concept behind the design of a product.
In the United States, there are more utility patents than design patents. There is also a difference in the length of time between the design and the utility patent as the former will only last upto 7 years with the average of 3 1/2 while utility patent could work for 17 years. Some companies have not utilized the patent system.
Fine gold jewelry is one of those product designs that fine gold jewelry makers did not feel needed patenting, since gold pieces are often made for specific events or for one single season and don’t require the expense of a seven-year patent. To acquire a patent, a company must pay at least $60. Some companies didn’t waste their time and funds to get patents since it only lasted for a few years and it could easily be dodged.
Utility design mechanisms can apply to over two decades which gives the individual a time frame of when the mechanism was introduced. But you cannot always determine when a piece jewelry was designed and made just by by its patent date. There is a smaller time frame within which a piece of jewelry can be estimated to have been made, since its design patent is shorter than a utility patent. But a manufacturer might continue making the fine gold jewelry without changing the design even after the fine gold jewelry design patent has expired, making it hard to determine the actual time the original patent was obtained on the jewelry design, and thus, hard to determine the age of a specific piece of fine gold jewelry.
Copyright laws were reformed in 1947 to give way for jewelry makers to give copyright to their designs. This meant that fine gold jewelry patents were not needed nearly as often as they had been previously. In 1955 the Trifari Company brought a suit against the Charel Jewelry company. Trifari Company claimed that Charel Jewelry had stolen some of their designs for costume jewelry, specifically the “bolero” designs. As compared to patents copyrights is said to be more proficient and valuable since it could gain faster approval last longer and cost less. Fine gold jewelry, if it’s copyrighted, will always display the copyright symbol beside the name of the manufacturing company.
Even though patents were eliminated it still gave fascinating views in the past.

